The Bottom Line Upfront 💡
RTX Corporation $RTX ( ▲ 0.17% ) is a $81B aerospace and defense powerhouse formed from the 2020 merger of United Technologies and Raytheon. The company operates three distinct but complementary businesses: Collins Aerospace (aircraft systems), Pratt & Whitney (jet engines), and Raytheon (defense systems). With a $218B backlog providing 2.7 years of locked-in revenue, RTX benefits from two powerful trends—rising global defense spending and recovering commercial aviation demand. While the company faces near-term challenges from powder metal issues in its GTF engines and supply chain pressures, its market-leading positions, massive R&D investment ($7.7B annually), and diversified revenue streams make it a solid dividend-paying industrial for long-term investors who believe in the future of flight and defense.
Partnership
Where Accomplished Wealth Builders Connect, Learn & Grow
Long Angle is a private, vetted community for high-net-worth entrepreneurs and executives. No fees, no pitches—just real peers navigating wealth at your level. Inside, you’ll find:
Self-made professionals, 30–55, $5M–$100M net worth
Confidential conversations, peer advisory groups, live meetups
Institutional-grade investments, $100M+ deployed annually
Strata Layers Chart

Layer 1: The Business Model 🏛️
Think of RTX as the company that makes flying possible—and keeps the bad guys at bay. Born from the 2020 marriage of United Technologies and Raytheon Company, RTX is essentially three companies in a trench coat, each doing something completely different but all related to making things fly, fight, or both.
The Three-Headed Monster
Collins Aerospace ($28.3B revenue ↗️) is like the interior designer and electrician for aircraft. They make everything from the cockpit displays that pilots stare at during turbulence to the landing gear that (hopefully) deploys when you're coming in for landing. Think of them as the company that makes planes "smart"—avionics, environmental systems, even the fancy seats in first class. Their sweet spot? Aftermarket services, where they maintain and repair all the stuff they originally installed. It's the classic "sell the razor, profit from the blades" model, except the blades cost millions and keep planes from falling out of the sky.
Pratt & Whitney ($28.1B revenue ↗️) builds the engines that actually make planes go vroom. Their crown jewel is the Geared Turbofan (GTF) engine family, which powers over 2,200 aircraft worldwide and burns 15-20% less fuel than older engines. Here's where it gets interesting: they often sell engines at break-even or even losses initially, then make bank over the engine's 20-30 year lifespan through maintenance contracts and spare parts. It's like giving away printers to sell expensive ink cartridges, except the ink cartridges cost hundreds of thousands of dollars and keep 300 people alive at 35,000 feet.
Raytheon ($26.7B revenue →) is the "defense" part of the equation—they make missiles, radars, and other things that go boom (or prevent things from going boom). Think Patriot missile defense systems, Tomahawk cruise missiles, and radar systems so advanced they can probably tell you what the pilot had for breakfast. Their business model revolves around long-term government contracts that often span decades, with built-in modernization and upgrade opportunities.
How They Actually Make Money
RTX's revenue streams are beautifully diversified:
40% from U.S. government sales (steady but bureaucratic)
43% from international customers (growing but geopolitically risky)
17% from domestic commercial sales
The company operates on a "razor and blades" model across all segments. They'll sell you the initial equipment (sometimes at thin margins), then make their real money on the 20-30 year aftermarket relationship. It's a beautiful business model when it works—sticky customers, predictable cash flows, and high switching costs.
Key Metrics to Watch
RTX obsesses over several key metrics:
Backlog: $218B ↗️ (that's 2.7 years of revenue already locked in)
Operating cash flow: $7.2B (the real measure of cash generation)
R&D spending: $7.7B total (9.5% of revenue—this is a tech company disguised as an industrial)
Book-to-bill ratio: How much new business they're winning vs. shipping
The company's manufacturing footprint is massive—230 facilities across 30 countries with 186,000 employees. About 68% of employees are in the U.S., which matters for security clearances and government contracts.
Layer 2: Category Position 🏆
RTX operates in markets where being second place often means being irrelevant. These are winner-take-most industries with massive barriers to entry, long development cycles, and customers who really, really care about reliability.
The Competitive Landscape
In commercial aerospace, RTX faces a fascinating dynamic. The aircraft market is essentially a Boeing-Airbus duopoly, making supplier relationships crucial. Collins Aerospace battles Honeywell, Safran, and Thales for systems contracts, while Pratt & Whitney is locked in an epic three-way engine war with GE Aerospace and Rolls-Royce. The GTF engine has been Pratt's secret weapon, offering superior fuel efficiency that airlines love (especially when fuel costs $100+ per barrel).
The defense market is a different beast entirely. Here, RTX competes against Lockheed Martin, Boeing Defense, Northrop Grumman, and General Dynamics. However, unlike commercial markets where price often prevails, defense contracts tend to favor technological capability, security clearances, and long-standing relationships. Raytheon's Patriot system, for example, has been protecting allies since the 1980s—that's the kind of sticky customer relationship that makes CFOs smile.
Recent Wins and Challenges
The Good: RTX has been winning big international defense contracts, particularly as NATO allies boost defense spending. Germany ordered $2.4B worth of Patriot systems in 2024, and Poland, Romania, and others are lining up. The commercial aerospace recovery has been strong, with Collins benefiting from increased flight hours driving aftermarket demand.
The Not-So-Good: The powder metal issue that hit Pratt & Whitney's GTF engines in 2023 continues to cause headaches. While manageable within existing reserves, it's keeping aircraft grounded longer than anyone wants. Supply chain disruptions and inflation have also pressured margins across the industry.
Market Position Assessment
RTX holds enviable positions across its markets:
Collins: Strong #2 position in most aerospace systems markets
Pratt & Whitney: Solid #3 in commercial engines but #1 in military engines for several key programs
Raytheon: Market leader in missile defense and strong positions in radar/sensors
The company's scale advantages are real—$7.7B in R&D spending buys a lot of innovation, and their global manufacturing footprint provides both cost advantages and local market access.
Layer 3: Show Me The Money! 📈
RTX's financials tell the story of a company that's finally hitting its stride after years of integration challenges and pandemic disruption.
Revenue Breakdown: The Beautiful Diversification
By Segment (2024):
Collins Aerospace: $28.3B ↗️ (35% of total)
Pratt & Whitney: $28.1B ↗️ (35% of total)
Raytheon: $26.7B → (33% of total)
The near-perfect balance between segments is no accident—it provides stability when one market hits turbulence. When commercial aerospace struggled during COVID, defense kept the lights on. Now that commercial is recovering, both engines are firing.
By Geography:
United States: $67.7B ↗️ (84% of total)
International: $34.7B ↗️ (43% of total - yes, there's overlap due to U.S. exports)
By Customer Type:
U.S. Government: $32.2B (40%)
Commercial aerospace: $37.4B (46%)
International government: $11.1B (14%)
The Margin Story
Operating margins improved dramatically in 2024:
Overall: 8.1% ↗️ (vs. 5.2% in 2023)
Collins: 14.6% (steady and beautiful)
Pratt & Whitney: 7.2% ↗️ (recovering from powder metal issues)
Raytheon: 9.7% ↗️ (solid defense margins)
Collins consistently delivers the best margins thanks to their aftermarket-heavy business model. Raytheon's margins reflect the steady, profitable nature of defense contracts. Pratt & Whitney's margins are more volatile, reflecting the cyclical nature of engine deliveries and the impact of the powder metal matter.
Layer 4: What Do We Have to Believe? 📚
The Bull Case: Why RTX Could Soar 🚀
Believe This: The world is becoming more dangerous and more connected, driving demand for both defense systems and commercial aviation.
For the bull case to work, you need to believe:
Global defense spending stays elevated: Geopolitical tensions aren't going away, and allies will continue modernizing their militaries. RTX's established programs like Patriot provide decades-long revenue streams.
Commercial aerospace recovery continues: Air travel demand keeps growing, especially internationally, driving both new aircraft orders and aftermarket services. The GTF engine's fuel efficiency advantage becomes more valuable as environmental regulations tighten.
Technology leadership pays off: RTX's massive R&D spending ($7.7B annually) creates sustainable competitive advantages in next-generation technologies like hypersonics, directed energy, and hybrid-electric propulsion.
Operational excellence delivers: Management successfully integrates the three businesses, realizes synergies, and improves margins through digital transformation and supply chain optimization.
The powder metal issue stays contained: Current reserves prove adequate, and the problem doesn't spread to other engine models or create lasting competitive damage.
The Bear Case: What Could Go Wrong 🐻
The Risks Are Real: RTX operates in cyclical, capital-intensive industries with long development cycles and demanding customers.
The bear case worries about:
Defense budget cuts: Political pressure to reduce military spending, especially if geopolitical tensions ease. RTX's 40% government revenue exposure creates vulnerability to budget cycles.
Commercial aerospace downturn: Economic recession reduces air travel demand, hurting both new aircraft orders and aftermarket services. Airlines defer maintenance and upgrades.
Powder metal problem spreads: The GTF engine issues prove more extensive than expected, requiring additional reserves and damaging Pratt & Whitney's competitive position permanently.
Supply chain breakdown: Continued disruptions and inflation pressure margins. RTX's complex global supply chain creates multiple failure points.
Technology disruption: New entrants (especially Chinese competitors with government backing) leapfrog RTX's technology, or alternative propulsion systems (electric, hydrogen) make current engines obsolete faster than expected.
Integration execution risk: The three-company combination never fully realizes promised synergies, leaving RTX as an unwieldy conglomerate trading at a discount.
The Bottom Line Assessment
RTX is a high-quality industrial company with strong market positions, diversified revenue streams, and significant barriers to entry protecting its businesses. The company has successfully navigated the challenging integration of three major businesses while dealing with pandemic disruption and supply chain chaos.
The investment thesis is straightforward: RTX benefits from two powerful long-term trends—increasing global defense spending and growing commercial aviation demand. The company's technology leadership, manufacturing scale, and customer relationships create sustainable competitive advantages.
However, this isn't a growth stock—it's a steady industrial that will likely deliver returns in line with GDP growth plus dividends. The powder metal issue shows how operational problems can create significant near-term volatility, even for established companies.
The Verdict: RTX is a solid, dividend-paying industrial for investors who believe in the long-term growth of aerospace and defense markets. Just don't expect it to be exciting—unless you find missile defense systems and jet engines as thrilling as we do. 🚀
AI-written, human-approved
Disclaimer: This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities. The information contained in this report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but StrataFinance does not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, or timeliness.