The Bottom Line Upfront π‘
On Holding AG $ONON ( β² 0.97% ) is a Swiss athletic footwear company that's achieved remarkable success in just over a decade, growing from startup to CHF 2.3 billion in annual revenue. The company has built a premium brand around innovative technologies like CloudTec and LightSpray, competing successfully against giants like Nike and Adidas in the performance running market.
The Good: Exceptional growth (29.4% revenue growth in 2024), strong margins (60.6% gross margin), innovative technology, premium brand positioning, and nearly CHF 1 billion in cash. The company is executing brilliantly and has carved out a meaningful position in the competitive athletic footwear market.
The Bad: At current prices around $42.40 per share, the stock is massively overvalued. Even under optimistic assumptions, fair value appears to be between $1.79-$16.46 per share, suggesting 60-95% downside risk.
Sponsorship
Busy Isnβt a Badge. Itβs a Bottleneck..
Every minute you spend on low-value work costs you opportunities you canβt get back. That is why BELAY exists: to help leaders like you get back to what matters.
Our Delegation Guide + Worksheet gives you a simple system to:
β Identify what to delegate
β Prioritize whatβs costing you most
β Hand it off strategically
And when youβre ready, BELAY provides top-tier remote staffing solutions β U.S.-based, highly vetted, and personally matched β to help you put those hours back where they belong: fueling strategy, leadership, and growth.
Real freedom starts with a right partner.
Strata Layers Chart

Layer 1: The Business Model ποΈ
What Does On Actually Do? π€
Imagine if someone took the precision of a Swiss watch, the innovation of a tech startup, and the ambition of a sports brand, then threw them all into a blender with some serious Alpine attitude. That's essentially On Holding AGβa Swiss company that's trying to revolutionize how we think about athletic footwear and sportswear.
Founded in 2010 by three Swiss entrepreneurs (including a former professional triathlete who was apparently very picky about his running shoes), On has built their entire business around one core idea: making premium performance products that help people move better. Their mission statement sounds like it came from a motivational poster: "to ignite the human spirit through movement." But hey, when you're generating over CHF 2.3 billion βοΈ in annual sales, maybe the cheesy mission statements work.
The Money-Making Machine π°
On operates what they call a "single-brand consumer products business"βfancy speak for "we make really good stuff under one brand name."
Product Portfolio:
Footwear (94.9% of sales): The bread and butter. Over 85 different shoe styles across five main categories
Apparel (4.4% of sales): Growing fast βοΈ with 46.7% growth in 2024
Accessories (0.8% of sales): The small but mighty category growing at 49.5% βοΈ
Two-Channel Revenue Model:
Wholesale Channel (59.3% of sales): Selling to big retailers like Foot Locker, Dick's Sporting Goods, and JD Sports. Think of this as the "let other people do the hard work of retail" approach.
Direct-to-Consumer (40.7% of sales): Their own e-commerce platform and 19 premium retail stores plus 30 smaller stores in China. This is where the real margin magic happens.
The Secret Sauce: Asset-Light Operations π
Here's where On gets clever. They don't own a single factory. Instead, they work with fewer than 25 carefully selected suppliers (mostly in Vietnam and Indonesia) to manufacture their products.
Key Internal Metrics They Watch:
Gross Margin: Currently sitting pretty at 60.6% βοΈ (that's really good, by the way)
DTC Growth: Their direct sales grew 40.3% βοΈ in 2024, outpacing wholesale
Geographic Diversification: Americas (63.9%), EMEA (24.9%), Asia-Pacific (11.2%)
Brand Heat: 65 athletes competed in the Paris Olympics wearing On gear, securing 7 medals
Layer 2: Category Position π
David vs. Goliath (and Goliath's Friends) βοΈ
On is playing in one of the most brutally competitive industries on the planet: athletic footwear and apparel. They're going toe-to-toe with some serious heavyweights:
The Titans:
Nike: The 800-pound gorilla with marketing budgets that could fund small countries
Adidas: The German engineering powerhouse with deep heritage
Under Armour: The American upstart that's been struggling lately
Lululemon: The yoga pants empire expanding into running
The Specialists:
Brooks Sports: The running purist's choice
ASICS: Japanese precision in running shoes
Hoka: The maximalist cushioning brand that's been growing like crazy
New Balance: The "dad shoe" brand that somehow became cool again
Layer 3: Show Me The Money! π
The Revenue Breakdown πΈ
On's financial performance in 2024 was like watching a Swiss watch tick perfectlyβeverything moved in the right direction:
Total Revenue: CHF 2.32 billion βοΈ (29.4% growth)
By Product Category:
Shoes: CHF 2.20 billion (94.9% of sales) βοΈ 28.5% growth
Apparel: CHF 101 million (4.4% of sales) βοΈ 46.7% growth
Accessories: CHF 17.7 million (0.8% of sales) βοΈ 49.5% growth
The apparel and accessories growth rates are particularly impressiveβwhen your smallest categories are growing at nearly 50%, that suggests you're onto something.
By Sales Channel:
Wholesale: CHF 1.38 billion (59.3%) βοΈ 22.8% growth
Direct-to-Consumer: CHF 943 million (40.7%) βοΈ 40.3% growth
The DTC channel is growing nearly twice as fast as wholesale, which is exactly what On wants to see. Direct sales mean higher margins and better customer relationships.
By Geography:
Americas: CHF 1.48 billion (63.9%) βοΈ 27.4% growth
EMEA: CHF 578 million (24.9%) βοΈ 18.2% growth
Asia-Pacific: CHF 260 million (11.2%) βοΈ 84.5% growth
Layer 4: Long-Term Valuation (DCF Model) π°
The Uncomfortable Truth About On's Valuation π¬
Alright, time for some tough love. On is an amazing company with incredible growth, innovative products, and a bright future. However, at the current stock price of around $42.40 (as of November 17, 2025), it's priced as if it's going to cure cancer while simultaneously winning every Olympic medal.
DCF Analysis Results:
Conservative Scenario Fair Value: $1.79 per share
Assumes growth deceleration and margin compression
Downside: -95.8% βοΈ
Optimistic Scenario Fair Value: $16.46 per share
Assumes sustained premium growth and margin expansion
Downside: -61.2% βοΈ
What's Driving These Valuations? π
The Growth Challenge: On has been growing at an average of 38% over the past two years. That's phenomenal, but it's also mathematically impossible to sustain forever. Even in our optimistic scenario, we assume growth gradually decelerates from 30% to 7% over five yearsβand that still might be too generous.
The Competition Reality: On is competing against Nike (market cap: ~$200 billion) and Adidas (market cap: ~$40 billion) with vastly superior resources, distribution networks, and marketing budgets.
The Margin Question: On's current 60.6% gross margins are impressive, but they face pressure from two directions:
Scale Economics: As they grow, they might need to compete more on price
Key Valuation Assumptions π
What We're Betting On (Optimistic Case):
Revenue growth of 30%, 20%, 15%, 10%, 7% over next 5 years
Operating margins expanding from 10% to 13% (operating leverage)
Terminal growth rate of 3.5% (above GDP growth)
WACC of 10.5% (premium to market but not excessive)
What Could Go Wrong (Conservative Case):
Revenue growth of 20%, 10%, 6%, 4%, 2% (rapid deceleration)
Operating margins compressing from 8.5% to 6.5% (competitive pressure)
Terminal growth rate of 2.5% (in line with GDP)
WACC of 11.7% (reflecting high business risk)
This doesn't mean On is a bad company. It's actually a great company that's priced for perfection and then some. Sometimes the best companies make the worst investments when the price is wrong.
Layer 5: What Do We Have to Believe? π
The Bull Case: Believing in Swiss Magic β¨
To justify buying On at current prices, you'd need to believe several things that are possible but far from certain:
Sustained Premium Growth (25%+ for years)
On needs to keep growing at rates that would make most companies jealous while maintaining their premium positioning. This means successfully expanding globally, launching new product categories, and stealing market share from entrenched competitors.
The Innovation Edge Holds
Technologies like CloudTec and LightSpray need to provide lasting competitive advantages. On needs to keep innovating faster than Nike and Adidas can copy or leapfrog them.
DTC Channel Dominance
The direct-to-consumer channel needs to become the dominant revenue source, driving higher margins and better customer relationships. This means successfully competing with Amazon, specialty retailers, and the brands' own DTC efforts.
The Bear Case: Reality Bites Back π»
Here's what keeps me up at night about On's valuation:
The Growth Math Problem
Growing at 30%+ annually becomes mathematically impossible as you get bigger. On is already at CHF 2.3 billion in salesβmaintaining high growth rates from here requires capturing massive market share from entrenched competitors.
Competitive Retaliation
Nike and Adidas have deeper pockets, better distribution, and more resources. If they decide On is a real threat, they can make life very difficult very quickly. Remember what happened to Under Armour when Nike decided to fight back?
Margin Compression Inevitable
Those beautiful 60.6% gross margins are a target. As On scales and faces more competition, pricing pressure is almost inevitable. Even a few percentage points of margin compression would devastate the current valuation.
Economic Sensitivity
Premium athletic wear is somewhat discretionary. In a recession, consumers might trade down to cheaper alternatives, hitting On's volumes and margins simultaneously.
My Take: Great Company, Wrong Price π―
On Holding is genuinely impressive. They've built a premium brand from scratch, developed innovative technology, and achieved remarkable growth while maintaining profitability. The management team clearly knows what they're doing, and the Swiss engineering angle provides real differentiation.
Final Thought: If you already own On stock, you might want to consider taking some profits. If you're thinking about buying, maybe wait for a better entry point. Swiss precision is admirable, but overpaying for it isn't very precise at all. π¨π
AI-written, human-approved
Disclaimer: This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities. The information contained in this report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but StrataFinance does not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, or timeliness.


