In partnership with

The Bottom Line Upfront 💡

Lockheed Martin $LMT ( ▲ 0.93% ) is the ultimate "things that go boom and fly" company, generating $71 billion annually by building some of the world's most sophisticated military hardware. With 73% of revenue from the U.S. Government and a massive $176 billion backlog, they offer remarkable revenue predictability in an industry where performance trumps price. The F-35 fighter jet alone generates $18+ billion annually across 19 countries, creating a multi-decade revenue stream that's nearly impossible to disrupt.

However, 2024 brought execution challenges with $1.97 billion in losses on classified programs, highlighting the risks of pushing technological boundaries under fixed-price contracts. While the company maintains strong cash generation ($5.3B free cash flow) and returned $6.8B to shareholders, investors must weigh steady defense spending growth against program execution risks and heavy government dependence. For those comfortable with the defense industry's unique dynamics, LMT offers compelling exposure to global security trends with defensive characteristics during economic downturns.

Partnership

Time to change compliance forever.

We’re thrilled to announce our $32M Series A at a $300M valuation, led by Insight Partners!

Delve is shaping the future of GRC with an AI-native approach that cuts busywork and saves teams hundreds of hours. Startups like Lovable, Bland, and Browser trust our AI to get compliant—fast.

To celebrate, we’re giving back with 3 limited-time offers:

  • $15,000 referral bonus if you refer a founding engineer we hire

  • $2,000 off compliance setup for new customers – claim here

  • A custom Delve doormat for anyone who reposts + comments on our LinkedIn post (while supplies last!)

Thank you for your support—this is just the beginning.

👉 Get started with Delve

Strata Layers Chart

Layer 1: The Business Model 🏛️

Think of Lockheed Martin as the ultimate "things that go boom and fly" company, but with a PhD in rocket science. Born from the 1995 merger of Lockheed Corporation and Martin Marietta, this Bethesda-based giant has spent nearly three decades perfecting the art of building some of the most sophisticated military hardware on the planet.

What They Actually Do 🎯

Lockheed Martin operates like a high-tech military shopping mall with four main departments:

Aeronautics (40% of revenue) - The crown jewel here is the F-35 Lightning II, a stealth fighter so advanced it's basically a flying computer that happens to carry missiles. This single program generates $18+ billion annually (26% of total company sales) and involves 19 countries who've essentially committed their air forces to this platform for the next few decades. They also build the workhorses: C-130 cargo planes, F-16 fighters, and run the legendary Skunk Works division where they develop aircraft so secret they probably have aircraft we don't even know exist yet.

Missiles and Fire Control (18% of revenue) - These are the folks who make sure the bad guys' missiles don't reach their targets, and that our missiles definitely reach theirs. Their Patriot missile defense systems protect 17 nations, while their precision strike weapons like JASSM and Hellfire have become household names (if your household happens to be the Pentagon). With global tensions rising, this segment has been busier than a one-legged cat in a sandbox.

Rotary and Mission Systems (24% of revenue) - The most diverse segment, covering everything from Black Hawk helicopters to naval combat systems to cybersecurity. Through their Sikorsky subsidiary, they build helicopters that can lift school buses (CH-53K King Stallion) and others that can land on aircraft carriers in rough seas. They also develop the "brains" for warships through their Aegis Combat System - think of it as the iPhone of naval warfare.

Space (18% of revenue) - Where they literally reach for the stars. They're building NASA's Orion spacecraft for deep space missions, developing next-gen missile warning satellites, and maintaining the Trident II submarine-launched ballistic missiles. As space becomes the new frontier for both exploration and warfare, this segment positions them at the intersection of Star Trek and national security.

The Money Machine 💰

Here's where it gets interesting: 73% of their $71 billion in 2024 revenue comes from the U.S. Government. This isn't your typical B2B relationship - these are multi-year, multi-billion dollar contracts that can span decades. The F-35 program alone is expected to continue production for years as the U.S. plans to buy 2,456 aircraft total.

Their business model creates remarkable revenue visibility through their $176 billion backlog ↗️ - essentially a pipeline of future revenue already under contract. About 35% of this backlog will convert to revenue in the next 12 months, with 60% converting within 24 months. It's like having a crystal ball for your revenue stream.

Key Success Metrics 📊

Lockheed Martin tracks several critical metrics that investors should monitor:

  • Backlog Growth: Currently at $176B ↗️, up from $160.6B in 2023

  • Funded vs. Unfunded Backlog: $107.8B is funded (money already appropriated)

  • Program Performance: They track "profit booking rate adjustments" - essentially how well they're executing on cost estimates

  • International Sales Mix: 26% of revenue, showing diversification beyond U.S. government

  • Free Cash Flow: $5.3B in 2024 ↘️, down from $6.2B in 2023

The Production Approach 🏭

Unlike consumer companies that mass-produce widgets, Lockheed Martin operates more like a high-end custom manufacturer. Each F-35 is essentially hand-built with thousands of components from hundreds of suppliers across multiple countries. Their 121,000 employees (including 70,000 engineers and scientists) work on programs that can take 10-20 years from initial design to final delivery.

The company uses a "percentage-of-completion" accounting method, recognizing revenue as work progresses rather than when products are delivered. This creates some accounting complexity but provides steady revenue recognition throughout long development cycles.

Layer 2: Category Position 🏆

Welcome to the defense industry oligopoly, where there are only a handful of companies capable of building the world's most advanced military systems, and they all know each other's phone numbers.

The Big Players 🎭

Lockheed Martin competes in what's essentially a five-company club:

Here's the weird part: these "competitors" often work together. Lockheed might compete with Boeing for a fighter jet contract while simultaneously buying engines from RTX and electronics from L3Harris for the same aircraft. It's like a corporate version of "Game of Thrones" where enemies become allies depending on the contract.

Market Position Strengths 💪

Lockheed Martin has built several competitive moats that would make Warren Buffett proud:

The F-35 Lock-in Effect: Once a country commits to the F-35 ecosystem, switching becomes prohibitively expensive. It's like choosing between iPhone and Android, except the switching costs involve retraining entire air forces and rebuilding maintenance infrastructure. With 19 countries now in the F-35 program, Lockheed has created a multi-decade revenue stream.

Security Clearance Advantage: Many of their programs require the highest levels of security clearance. You can't just hire away their engineers and start competing - the government has to trust you with national secrets first. This creates a significant barrier to entry.

Systems Integration Capability: While smaller companies might build individual components, Lockheed can integrate entire systems across multiple domains. When the military wants a fighter jet that talks to satellites, ships, and ground systems, there aren't many companies that can deliver the whole package.

Recent Competitive Dynamics 🔄

The landscape is evolving in interesting ways. Traditional defense contractors now face competition from tech companies and startups bringing commercial innovation to defense. SpaceX has disrupted the space launch market, while software companies compete for AI and cybersecurity contracts.

Lockheed is responding by increasing partnerships with commercial companies and making strategic acquisitions. Their recent $314 million purchase of Terran Orbital adds small satellite capabilities, positioning them for the "proliferated space constellation" trend - think networks of many small satellites instead of a few large ones.

Internationally, they face restrictions on technology transfer that can limit competitiveness against foreign competitors. However, their technological superiority and the security benefits of aligning with U.S. systems often outweigh these challenges. The F-35's international success proves this point.

Layer 3: Show Me The Money! 📈

Let's dive into the financial engine that powers this defense giant.

Revenue Breakdown 💵

By Business Segment (2024):

  • Aeronautics: $28.6B (40.3%) ↗️

  • Rotary and Mission Systems: $17.3B (24.3%) ↗️

  • Missiles and Fire Control: $12.7B (17.9%) ↗️

  • Space: $12.5B (17.6%) ↘️

All segments grew except Space, which declined slightly due to lower volume on classified programs and the Orion spacecraft.

By Customer Type:

  • U.S. Government: $52.0B (73.3%)

  • International: $18.5B (26.1%) ↗️

  • U.S. Commercial: $484M (0.7%)

The international growth is particularly noteworthy, driven by increased demand for missile defense systems and F-35 aircraft as global tensions rise.

By Contract Type:

  • Fixed-Price: $42.7B (60.1%)

  • Cost-Reimbursable: $28.3B (39.9%)

This mix is important because fixed-price contracts carry more risk (cost overruns hurt profitability) but potentially higher rewards, while cost-reimbursable contracts provide more predictable margins.

Layer 4: What Do We Have to Believe? 📚

Investing in Lockheed Martin requires taking a position on several key themes that will shape the company's future.

The Bull Case: Betting on Perpetual Conflict 🐂

Belief #1: Geopolitical Tensions Will Persist The bull case starts with the unfortunate reality that the world isn't becoming more peaceful. Russia's invasion of Ukraine, tensions in the South China Sea, Middle East conflicts, and the general trend toward great power competition all drive demand for advanced military systems. If you believe these tensions will continue (or escalate), Lockheed Martin benefits from increased defense spending globally.

Belief #2: Technological Superiority Matters More Than Cost In consumer markets, cheaper often wins. In defense, "good enough" can get your pilots killed. The bull case assumes that military customers will continue prioritizing technological superiority over cost, supporting Lockheed's premium pricing and high R&D spending. The F-35's international success despite its high cost supports this thesis.

Belief #3: The F-35 Ecosystem Creates Decades of Revenue With 19 countries committed and more expressing interest, the F-35 program could generate revenue for 30+ years. Each aircraft requires decades of maintenance, upgrades, and support services. Bulls believe this creates an annuity-like revenue stream that's nearly impossible to disrupt.

Belief #4: Space Becomes the Next Military Domain As satellites become critical infrastructure and space-based weapons become reality, military space spending should accelerate. Lockheed's position across the entire space value chain - from small satellites to deep space exploration to strategic missiles - positions them to benefit from space militarization.

Belief #5: Integration Capabilities Create Competitive Moats Modern warfare requires systems that work together seamlessly. Lockheed's ability to integrate aircraft, missiles, ships, satellites, and ground systems gives them advantages that pure-play competitors can't match. This systems integration capability should command premium pricing and win rates.

The Bear Case: When the Music Stops 🐻

Risk #1: U.S. Budget Reality Check The U.S. faces massive fiscal challenges with rising debt, aging demographics, and competing spending priorities. Defense spending, while politically popular, isn't immune to budget pressures. A significant reduction in U.S. defense spending would devastate Lockheed's business model, given their 73% government dependence.

Risk #2: Program Execution Disasters The 2024 classified program losses ($1.97B total) highlight the risks of fixed-price development contracts. When you're pushing the boundaries of physics and engineering, cost overruns are almost inevitable. A few more major program disasters could seriously damage profitability and credibility.

Risk #3: The F-35 Becomes a Liability While the F-35 is currently a cash cow, it's also a massive target for criticism. Cost overruns, technical issues, or a major accident could lead to program cuts or cancellations. With 26% of revenue tied to this single program, F-35 problems become company-wide problems.

Risk #4: Supply Chain Breakdown Modern military systems require thousands of specialized components from hundreds of suppliers. Supply chain disruptions, rare earth mineral shortages, or geopolitical restrictions on critical materials could cripple production. The company already faces supply chain challenges that have delayed deliveries and increased costs.

My Assessment: A Steady Giant with Execution Risks ⚖️

Lockheed Martin operates in a unique industry where the customer (governments) prioritizes performance over price, barriers to entry are enormous, and switching costs are prohibitive. Their $176 billion backlog provides remarkable revenue visibility, and their technological capabilities are genuinely world-class.

However, the 2024 classified program losses remind us that this isn't a risk-free business. When you're developing technologies that don't yet exist under fixed-price contracts, cost overruns are occupational hazards. The company's heavy dependence on U.S. government spending also creates concentration risk.

For investors, Lockheed Martin offers:

  • Steady, predictable revenue from long-term contracts

  • Strong cash generation supporting consistent dividends and buybacks

  • Exposure to secular growth themes like space commercialization and global defense spending

  • Defensive characteristics during economic downturns (governments still need defense)

But it also requires accepting:

  • Program execution risks that can cause significant earnings volatility

  • Political and budget risks from heavy government dependence

  • Limited growth optionality compared to commercial technology companies

  • Ethical considerations of investing in weapons manufacturing

The company trades at reasonable valuations for a business with this level of revenue predictability and competitive positioning. For investors comfortable with the defense industry's unique risks and ethical considerations, Lockheed Martin offers a compelling combination of steady cash flows, technological leadership, and exposure to long-term security trends.

AI-written, human-approved

Disclaimer: This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities. The information contained in this report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but StrataFinance does not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, or timeliness.

Reply

or to participate

More From Capital

No posts found