In partnership with
The Bottom Line Upfront 💡
Figma $FIG ( ▲ 4.72% ) successfully disrupted Adobe's design monopoly and dominates collaborative design, but trades at unsustainable valuations while burning massive amounts of cash. The company faces rising AI competition and execution risks that make current prices appear disconnected from fundamental value.
Sponsorship
Global HR shouldn't require five tools per country
Your company going global shouldn’t mean endless headaches. Deel’s free guide shows you how to unify payroll, onboarding, and compliance across every country you operate in. No more juggling separate systems for the US, Europe, and APAC. No more Slack messages filling gaps. Just one consolidated approach that scales.
Strata Layers Chart
Layer 1: The Business Model 🏛️
Think of Figma as the Google Docs of design tools. Before Figma came along in 2012, designers were stuck using desktop software like Adobe's Photoshop, passing files back and forth like we're living in 2005. Dylan Field had a better idea: what if design tools lived in the browser where everyone could collaborate in real-time?
What They Actually Do: Figma runs a freemium subscription business with four tiers:
Starter Plan: Free (the digital equivalent of free samples at Costco)
Professional: For small teams who need more features
Organization: For bigger companies with fancier needs
Enterprise: For corporations that require military-grade security and admin controls
The Product Portfolio has exploded recently:
Figma Design: The original collaborative design tool (their iPhone moment)
FigJam: Online whiteboarding (think Miro competitor)
Dev Mode: Tools specifically for developers
Figma Slides: Presentation software (PowerPoint, but cooler)
Four 2025 launches: Sites (website builder), Make (AI prototyping), Buzz (marketing assets), and Draw (detailed vector editing)
How They Measure Success:
Paid Customers with $10K+ ARR: 12,910 ↗️ (up 32%)
Paid Customers with $100K+ ARR: 1,262 ↗️ (up 44%)
Net Dollar Retention Rate: 131% (existing customers are spending 31% more year-over-year)
The business model is elegant: get teams hooked on free collaboration, then monetize as they need more seats, features, and enterprise capabilities. It's the classic SaaS playbook, executed in the design space.
Key Takeaway: Figma transformed design from a solo desktop activity into a collaborative browser-based workflow, creating a sticky subscription business that grows with customer teams.
Layer 2: Category Position 🏆
Figma is the David that slayed Goliath—if David then decided to become Goliath himself. They disrupted Adobe's decades-long dominance in design tools by making collaboration the core feature, not an afterthought.
The Competitive Landscape:
Adobe: The former king, still massive but playing catch-up on collaboration
Sketch: The Mac-only darling that Figma largely displaced
Newer AI-powered tools: The next wave of potential disruptors
Market Position Strengths:
First-mover advantage in browser-based collaborative design
Strong network effects (more users = more valuable)
Expanding beyond design into the full product development lifecycle
Growing enterprise penetration (44% growth in $100K+ customers ↗️)
The Adobe Saga: In 2022, Adobe tried to acquire Figma for $20 billion (yes, billion with a B). Regulators said "nope," and the deal died in December 2023. This actually strengthened Figma's position as the independent alternative, though it also means Adobe is now laser-focused on competing rather than acquiring.
Current Challenges: The company admits facing "intense competition" and specifically warns that "competitive developments in AI" could hurt their business. Translation: everyone and their grandmother is building AI-powered design tools now.
Key Takeaway: Figma successfully disrupted Adobe's design monopoly and maintains a strong position, but the AI revolution is creating new competitive threats that could reshape the entire category.
Layer 3: Show Me The Money! 📈
Here's where things get... interesting. Figma is growing like a weed but spending money like a drunken sailor at a casino.
Revenue Breakdown:
Q3 2025: $274M ↗️ (38% growth)
Geographic Split: $127M US, $147M International
Growth Driver: New customer acquisition (not just existing customers spending more)
The Expense Explosion 💥 This is where your jaw might drop:
Research & Development: $681M (248% of revenue!)
Sales & Marketing: $275M (100% of revenue)
General & Administrative: $371M (135% of revenue)
Total Operating Expenses: $1.3B vs $274M revenue
Yes, you read that right. They spent $1.3 billion to make $274 million. That's like spending $13 to earn $2.74.
What's Behind the Madness: The massive expenses are largely due to stock-based compensation from their August 2025 IPO. When they went public, $975.7 million in employee stock awards vested all at once. It's a one-time accounting hit, but it makes the numbers look absolutely bonkers.
The Real Operating Picture: Strip out the stock compensation, and you get their "Non-GAAP" operating income of $34M, or a 12% margin. Still not great, but not the financial apocalypse the raw numbers suggest.
Cost Structure Concerns:
AI investments are driving up infrastructure costs
Technical hosting expenses growing with platform usage
Heavy R&D spending (even excluding stock comp) to stay competitive
Cash Position:
$340M cash + $1.2B in marketable securities + $30M in digital assets
$500M revolving credit facility
Burning cash, but not in immediate danger
Key Takeaway: Figma is growing fast but the IPO created massive one-time expenses that obscure the underlying business performance—which is profitable on an adjusted basis but faces rising AI and infrastructure costs.
Layer 4: Long-Term Valuation (DCF Model) 💰
The Verdict: Significantly Overvalued 🚨
Scenario | Fair Value | vs Current Price (~$22) |
|---|---|---|
Conservative | -$2.11 | Negative intrinsic value |
Optimistic | -$0.79 | Still negative |
Wait, What? Yes, our DCF analysis suggests negative intrinsic value. Here's why:
The company's current expense structure is unsustainable (484% of revenue)
Even optimistic scenarios assume dramatic operational improvements
The massive losses and cash burn create significant financial risk
Key Assumptions:
Revenue growth slows from 38% to more sustainable levels
Company eventually achieves positive free cash flow (big assumption)
AI investments eventually pay off rather than just burning cash
Recommendation: AVOID - The current market price appears disconnected from fundamental value.
Note: This analysis focuses purely on financial fundamentals. The market may be pricing in future potential that isn't reflected in current cash flows.
Layer 5: What Do We Have to Believe? 📚
Bull Case 🚀
AI Revolution Pays Off: Figma's AI investments create a sustainable competitive moat and expand the addressable market beyond traditional designers
Platform Dominance: The expanded product portfolio (Sites, Make, Buzz, Draw) successfully captures the entire product development workflow, increasing customer lifetime value
Enterprise Expansion: Large organizations increasingly standardize on Figma, driving the high-value $100K+ customer segment
Bear Case 🐻
Expense Structure Unsustainable: Even without stock compensation, the company is spending heavily on R&D and infrastructure with unclear returns
AI Commoditization: AI design tools become commoditized, eroding Figma's competitive advantages and pricing power
Adobe Strikes Back: The tech giant uses its resources and existing customer relationships to win back market share
The Bottom Line: Figma built an impressive business by disrupting Adobe and creating the collaborative design category. However, the current valuation appears to price in perfection while the company faces rising costs, intense competition, and execution risks around AI integration. The fundamentals suggest significant downside risk at current prices.
What to Watch 👀
Key Metrics to Monitor:
Net Dollar Retention Rate: If this drops below 120%, it signals customer expansion is slowing
$100K+ ARR Customer Growth: Watch for deceleration—this is their highest-value segment
Non-GAAP Operating Margin: Needs to improve from 12% as stock compensation normalizes
Upcoming Catalysts:
Q4 2025 earnings (February 2026): First full quarter post-IPO without massive stock comp distortions
AI product adoption metrics: How well are the new AI features driving usage and pricing?
Enterprise sales momentum: Can they maintain 44% growth in large customers?
Competitive Developments:
Adobe's response to Figma's AI initiatives
New AI-powered design startups gaining traction
Microsoft or Google entering the collaborative design space
Red Flags to Watch For:
Free cash flow turning more negative
Customer acquisition costs rising faster than revenue per customer
Key executive departures (especially Dylan Field)
AI-written, human-approved
Disclaimer: This guide is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice, investment recommendations, or an offer or solicitation to buy or sell any securities. The information contained in this report has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but StrataFinance does not guarantee its accuracy, completeness, or timeliness.